4.7 Article

Geodetically Inferred Locking State of the Cascadia Megathrust Based on a Viscoelastic Earth Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 123, Issue 9, Pages 8056-8072

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB015620

Keywords

interseismic stress relaxation; megathrust locking; viscoelastic Earth; Cascadia subduction zone; interseismic deformation; finite element model

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Graduate Research School GeoSim

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a viscoelastic Earth, stresses slowly built up due to fault locking are relaxed concurrently during the entire interseismic period. This interseismic stress relaxation causes crustal deformation much farther away from the locked fault than can be explained using elastic models that neglect the relaxation. Here we develop a viscoelastic geodetic inversion model to address this problem at Cascadia. We invert similar to 500 horizontal velocity vectors based on continuous and campaign geodetic measurements over the past two decades. Ambiguities arising from long-term rotation of upper-plate crustal blocks are addressed by test-correcting the geodetic velocities with two different block-motion models. Fault back slip (i.e., slip deficit) Green's functions are derived using a Maxwell viscoelastic finite element model with realistic subduction zone structure and megathrust geometry. The preferred model features a narrow and shallow megathrust locked zone, consistent with earlier thermorheological reasoning. For an elastic model to fit the data to the same fidelity, megathrust locking has to extend to much greater depths. However, even with the viscoelastic model, the land-based geodetic data still cannot resolve whether there is some creep (incomplete locking) in the shallowest part of the megathrust far offshore. Neither can the land data fully resolve along-strike variations of the locking state. These ambiguities can be resolved only when adequate seafloor geodetic data are obtained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available