4.7 Article

Constraining crustal velocity fields with InSAR for Eastern Turkey: Limits to the block-like behavior of Eastern Anatolia

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages 5215-5234

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JB010909

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through the Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET) program
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) through Earthquakes without Frontiers (EwF) program
  3. NERC [NE/K011006/1, NE/K010867/1, come30001, NE/I028017/1, NE/J019895/1, NE/J01978X/1, NE/J016322/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [come30001, NE/K010867/1, NE/J01978X/1, NE/J016322/1, NE/K011006/1, NE/I028017/1, NE/J019895/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Sentinel-1 satellite mission will enable global strain rate mapping from interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) and GPS data, and methods to combine these data in velocity fields will become increasingly important. Here we use InSAR to measure interseismic deformation in Eastern Turkey, across a similar to 250,000 km(2) area that spans the Arabia-Eurasia plate boundary zone. From our InSAR data we first estimate slip rates and locking depths for the North and East Anatolian Faults (NAF and EAF) of 20 +/- 3 mm/yr and similar to 16 km and 11 +/- 3 mm/yr and similar to 16 km, respectively, but we also combine the InSAR data with existing GPS velocity measurements to construct high-resolution velocity and strain rate fields across the region for the first time. We calculate 2-D and 3-D velocity fields and find that strain is mainly localized across the NAF and EAF and that there is negligible differential vertical motion across the Eastern Anatolian plateau. We also show that high-resolution 2-D strain rate fields can be calculated from InSAR alone, even in the absence of GPS data. We fit a block model to our velocity field and estimate slip rates of similar to 21 mm/yr and similar to 8 mm/yr for the NAF and EAF, showing that our previous estimates differ from these values because they neglected crustal rotation. Although this rotation is an important component of the velocity field in Eastern Turkey, systematic residuals between our velocity field and the best fitting block for Anatolia suggest that the region is not block-like as proposed by previous authors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available