4.5 Article

Response of Tropical Terrestrial Gross Primary Production to the Super El Nino Event in 2015

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 123, Issue 10, Pages 3193-3203

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JG004571

Keywords

gross primary production; El Nino-Southern Oscillation; tropical terrestrial ecosystems; photosynthesis active radiation; light use efficiency

Funding

  1. National Major Research High-Performance Computing Program of China [2016YFB02008]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41705070]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy's Earth System Modeling (CMDV) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gross primary production (GPP) in tropical terrestrial ecosystems plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle and climate change. The strong 2015-2016 El Nino event offers a unique opportunity to investigate how GPP in the tropical terrestrial ecosystems responds to climatic forcing. This study uses two GPP products and concurrent climate data to investigate the GPP anomalies and their underlying causes. We find that both GPP products show an enhanced GPP in 2015 for the tropical terrestrial ecosystem as a whole relative to the multiyear mean of 2001-2015, and this enhancement is the net result of GPP increase in tropical forests and decrease in nonforests. We show that the increased GPP in tropical forests during the El Nino event is consistent with increased photosynthesis active radiation as a result of a reduction in clouds, while the decreased GPP in nonforests is consistent with increased water stress as a result of a reduction of precipitation and an increase of temperature. These results reveal the strong coupling of ecosystem and climate that is different in forest and nonforest ecosystems and provide a test case for carbon cycle parameterization and carbon-climate feedback simulation in models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available