4.6 Article

A high-sensitive HMab-2 specifically detects IDH1-R132H, the most common IDH mutation in gliomas

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.070

Keywords

IDH1; IDH1 mutation; R132H; Monoclonal antibody; HMab-2

Funding

  1. Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED
  2. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25462242]
  3. Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science (PDIS) from AMED
  4. Basic Science and Platform Technology Program for Innovative Biological Medicine from AMED
  5. Regional Innovation Strategy Support Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25462242, 24390339] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have been detected in gliomas and other tumors. Although IDH1 catalyzes the oxidative carboxylation of isocitrate to alpha-ketoglutarate (alpha-KG) in cytosol, mutated IDH1 proteins possess the ability to change alpha-KG into the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG). Several monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for IDH1 mutations have been established, such as H09, IMab-1, and HMab-1 against IDH1-R132H, which is the most frequent IDH1 mutation in gliomas. In this study, we established a novel high-sensitive mAb HMab-2, which reacts with IDH1-R132H but not with wild type IDH1 in ELISA. HMab-2 reacted only with IDH1-R132H, not with wild type IDH1/2 and other IDH1/2 mutants in Western-blot analysis. Furthermore, HMab-2 recognized IDH1-R132H more sensitively compared with our previously established HMab-1. HMab-2 detected endogenous IDH1-R132H protein expressed in glioblastoma in immunohistochemical analysis. HMab-2 is expected to be useful for the diagnosis of IDH1-R132H-bearing tumors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available