4.6 Article

A super Asian dust storm over the East and South China Seas: Disproportionate dust deposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 118, Issue 13, Pages 7169-7181

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50405

Keywords

Asian dust; dust deposition; dust iron; East China Sea; South China Sea; long-range transport

Funding

  1. NSC [NSC 99-2611-M-001-005, NSC 99-2628-M-001-006, NSC100-2628-M-001-008-MY4, NSC 100-2111-M-001-002, NSC 100-2621-M-001-002-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A super Asian dust (SAD) storm that originated from North China has affected East Asia since 20 March 2010. The tempo-spatial and size distributions of aerosol Al, a tracer of wind-blown dust, were measured on a regional aerosol network in March 2010. Two dust events were recorded: the SAD and a relatively moderate AD event. The SAD clouds raised Al concentrations to similar to 50 mu g/m(3) on 21 and 22 March over the East China Sea (ECS) and occupied there for similar to 5 days. The SAD plume also stretched toward the South China Sea (SCS) on 21 March however, it caused a maximum Al concentration of similar to 8.5 mu g/m(3) only, much lower than that observed in the ECS. In comparison, a weaker dust plume on 16 March caused Al maximum of similar to 4 mu g/m(3) over the ECS, and comparably, similar to 3 mu g/m(3) in the SCS. Dry dust deposition was measured during the peak phase of the SAD at 178 mg/m(2)/d, which corresponded to dry deposition velocities of 0.2-0.6 cm/s only, much lower than the commonly adopted one (1-2 cm/s). The corresponding increase in dust deposition by the SAD was up to a factor of similar to 12, which was, however, considerably disproportionate to the increase in dust concentration (i.e., the factor of over 100). In certain cases, synoptic atmospheric conditions appear to be more important in regulating dust contribution to the SCS than the strength of AD storms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available