4.6 Review

Reducing the Mortality Gap in People With Severe Mental Disorders: The Role of Lifestyle Psychosocial Interventions

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00463

Keywords

excess mortality; physical health; severe mental disorders; schizophrenia; bipolar disorder; depression; lifestyle psychosocial interventions; low-and-middle income countries

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College London NHS Foundation Trust
  3. NIHR Asset Global Health Unit award
  4. National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health [R01MH100470]
  5. MRC [MR/S001255/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH100470] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This mini-review considers the mortality gap in persons with severe mental disorder (SMD) globally. Current estimates of 10-20 years of potential life lost may be too conservative, both in high (HIC) and low and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is an emerging consensus that natural causes account for the majority of deaths in persons with SMD in both resource settings. In HICs, cardiovascular causes predominate, and can be attributed to individual, health-system and societal level risk factors. Psychosocial lifestyle interventions target behavior specific risk factors for physical ill-health. There is good evidence for tailored weight-loss programmes, but mixed evidence for smoking cessation, substance misuse and risky sexual behavior. In terms of supporting persons with SMD, nurse-led services and the utilization of peer-support are showing promise. Future research efforts must focus on effective interventions and health system models for both high and low resource settings to address this startling health inequality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available