4.5 Article

High- degree gravity models from GRAIL primary mission data

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
Volume 118, Issue 8, Pages 1676-1698

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgre.20118

Keywords

lunar gravity; orbit determination; KBRR data; planetary geodesy

Funding

  1. NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS) at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  2. NASA GRAIL Mission
  3. NASA Discovery Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have analyzed Kaband range rate (KBRR) and Deep Space Network (DSN) data from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) primary mission (1 March to 29 May 2012) to derive gravity models of the Moon to degree 420, 540, and 660 in spherical harmonics. For these models, GRGM420A, GRGM540A, and GRGM660PRIM, a Kaula constraint was applied only beyond degree 330. Variancecomponent estimation (VCE) was used to adjust the a priori weights and obtain a calibrated error covariance. The global rootmeansquare error in the gravity anomalies computed from the error covariance to 320x320 is 0.77 mGal, compared to 29.0 mGal with the preGRAIL model derived with the SELENE mission data, SGM150J, only to 140x140. The global correlations with the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeterderived topography are larger than 0.985 between l =120 and 330. The freeair gravity anomalies, especially over the lunar farside, display a dramatic increase in detail compared to the preGRAIL models (SGM150J and LP150Q) and, through degree 320, are free of the orbittrackrelated artifacts present in the earlier models. For GRAIL, we obtain an a posteriori fit to the Sband DSN data of 0.13 mm/s. The a posteriori fits to the KBRR data range from 0.08 to 1.5 m/s for GRGM420A and from 0.03 to 0.06 m/s for GRGM660PRIM. Using the GRAIL data, we obtain solutions for the degree 2 Love numbers, k(20)=0.0246150.0000914, k(21)=0.0239150.0000132, and k(22)=0.0248520.0000167, and a preliminary solution for the k(30) Love number of k(30)=0.007340.0015, where the Love number error sigmas are those obtained with VCE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available