4.7 Review

Dendrimer-based magnetic resonance imaging agents for brain cancer

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
Volume 61, Issue 11, Pages 1420-1443

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-018-9323-6

Keywords

dendrimer; contrast agent; blood-brain barrier; tumor targeting; magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer [EL2016.LNCC/LPP]
  2. French National Research Agency [ANR-15-ENM2-0006-02, ANR-16-ENM2-0004-02]
  3. Campus France ORCHID program
  4. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain cancer is one of the most lethal and difficult-to-treat cancers because of its physical location and biological barriers. The mainstay of brain cancer treatment is surgical resection, which demands precise imaging for tumor localization and delineation. Thanks to advances in bioimaging, brain cancer can be detected earlier and resected more reliably. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most common and preferred method to delineate brain cancer, and a contrast agent is often required to enhance imaging contrast. Dendrimers, a special family of synthetic macromolecules, constitute a particularly appealing platform for constructing MRI contrast agents by virtue of their well-defined three-dimensional structure, tunable nanosize and abundant surface terminals, which allow the accommodation of high payloads and numerous functionalities. Tuning the dendrimer size, branching and surface composition in conjunction with conjugation of MRI functionalities and targeting moieties can alter the relaxivity for MRI, overcome the blood-brain barrier and enhance tumor-specific targeting, hence improving the imaging quality and safety profile for precise and accurate imaging of brain tumors. This short review highlights the recent progress, opportunities and challenges in developing dendrimer-based MRI contrast agents for brain tumor imaging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available