4.8 Article

Multimodel Framework for Indoor Localization Under Mobile Edge Computing Environment

Journal

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 4844-4853

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2872133

Keywords

Combinatorial optimization problem; indoor localization; mobile edge computing; multimodel framework; NP-hardness

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61772454, 61811530332, 61872048, 61702491]
  2. Science and Technology Program of State Grid Corporation of China [5442DZ160009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Location estimation technology under the wireless environment has become a vital technology in the field of mobile edge computing. Especially, under the mobile edge of entire networks environment, indoor location estimation is gradually getting the interest research and application topic, due to technical constraints of global positioning system technology for indoor environment and the popularity of the mobile edge computing servers. In this paper, the widely used single-model framework for indoor localization is presented as an introduction, which consists of three stages: 1) sample data collection; 2) model building; and 3) localization estimation. And then, through analyzing of the actual scene of indoor localization, a new framework for indoor localization under mobile edge computing environment, named Multimodel, is proposed from the theoretical perspective. It is mainly based on the observation that the environment of the sample data collection and that of localization data collection may change seriously. In order to make up for the shortcomings of this framework, two combinatorial optimization problems are proposed. Later, we discuss the NP-hardness of them in several different cases. In addition, two heuristic algorithms are given, and the performance of which are illustrated by the corresponding experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available