4.7 Article

Aligning Single-Cell Developmental and Reprogramming Trajectories Identifies Molecular Determinants of Myogenic Reprogramming Outcome

Journal

CELL SYSTEMS
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 258-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.07.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [DP2HD088158, 1DP2OD00667, P01GM099117]
  2. Fondazione Telethon Core Grant
  3. Armenise-Harvard Foundation Career Development Award
  4. European Research Council [759154]
  5. Rita-Levi Montalcini program from MIUR
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [759154] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular reprogramming through manipulation of defined factors holds great promise for large-scale production of cell types needed for use in therapy and for revealing principles of gene regulation. However, most reprogramming systems are inefficient, converting only a fraction of cells to the desired state. Here, we analyze MYOD-mediated reprogramming of human fibroblasts to myotubes, a well-characterized model system for direct conversion by defined factors, at pseudotemporal resolution using single-cell RNA-seq. To expose barriers to efficient conversion, we introduce a novel analytic technique, trajectory alignment, which enables quantitative comparison of gene expression kinetics across two biological processes. Reprogrammed cells navigate a trajectory with branch points that correspond to two alternative decision points, with cells that select incorrect branches terminating at aberrant or incomplete reprogramming outcomes. Analysis of these branch points revealed insulin and BMP signaling as crucial molecular determinants of reprogramming. Single-cell trajectory alignment enables rigorous quantitative comparisons between biological trajectories found in diverse processes in development, reprogramming, and other contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available