4.1 Article

Biological Consequences of Winter-Feeding of Mule Deer in Developed Landscapes in Northern Utah

Journal

WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 252-260

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.41

Keywords

browse utilization; developed landscapes; mortality; mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; productivity; survival; Utah; winter-feeding

Funding

  1. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
  2. Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife
  3. Sportsmen for Habitat
  4. Pope and Young Club
  5. Bridgerland Outdoor Coalition
  6. Utah Chapter of the Wildlife Society
  7. Jack H. Berryman Institute for Wildlife Damage Management, Quinney Professorship for Wildlife Management
  8. S. J. and Jesse E. Quinney Foundation
  9. Utah State University Wildland Resources Department
  10. Utah State University Wildland Resources Department, and Utah State University Extension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Winter-feeding of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in developed landscapes is often advocated by stakeholders to compensate for lost or fragmented winter range. However the reported benefits of winterfeeding mule deer to increase survival and productivity in altered landscapes are mixed. Few studies have examined the long-term effects of winter-feeding on mule deer productivity. We studied the effects of a winter-feeding program conducted in a developed landscape in northern Utah, USA from 2001 to 2006 on the productivity, survival, and mortality of 92 adult female deer (does) that were captured and radiocollared on 4 feed and 4 nonfeed sites. We also evaluated the potential for feeding programs to impact winter-range habitat quality through increased browse utilization. Fawn production (P = 0.36), and survival (P = 0.12) did not differ for fed and nonfed does. Deer-vehicle collisions were the primary cause of mortality for radiocollared deer in both populations (P = 0.97). Utilization of desired browse species was higher on sites where deer were fed (P <= 0.001), although deer numbers were similar at feed and nonfeed sites. When developing big game winter-feeding policies for developed landscapes, managers must consider the full range of long-term potential population and habitat impacts to include increased anthropogenic-related mortality and increased potential for habitat degradation prior to policy implementation. (C) 2011 The Wildlife Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available