4.1 Article

Mutational pressure dictates synonymous codon usage in freshwater unicellular alpha - cyanobacterial descendant Paulinella chromatophora and beta - cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC6301

Journal

SPRINGERPLUS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-492

Keywords

Paulinella chromatophora; Synechococcus elongatus; Synonymous codon usage; Mutational pressure; Chromatophore

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (Promotion of University Research and Scientific Excellence), Government of India, New Delhi, India
  2. University Grants Commission, New Delhi under the project 'Establishment of genetic identity for Indian coffee germplasm using chloroplast genome sequences' [41-583/2012 (SR)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Comparative study of synonymous codon usage variations and factors influencing its diversification in alpha - cyanobacterial descendant Paulinella chromatophora and beta - cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC6301 has not been reported so far. In the present study, we investigated various factors associated with synonymous codon usage in the genomes of P. chromatophora and S. elongatus PCC6301 and findings were discussed. Results: Mutational pressure was identified as the major force behind codon usage variation in both genomes. However, correspondence analysis revealed that intensity of mutational pressure was higher in S. elongatus than in P. chromatophora. Living habitats were also found to determine synonymous codon usage variations across the genomes of P. chromatophora and S. elongatus. Conclusions: Whole genome sequencing of alpha-cyanobacteria in the cyanobium clade would certainly facilitate the understanding of synonymous codon usage patterns and factors contributing its diversification in presumed ancestors of photosynthetic endosymbionts of P. chromatophora.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available