Journal
IMA FUNGUS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 145-154Publisher
INT MYCOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.09
Keywords
Article 59; Ascomycetes; Fungi; nomenclature; one fungus-one name; pleomorphic fungi; taxonomy; unit nomenclature
Categories
Funding
- Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P27645-B16]
- Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P27645] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In advancing to one name for fungi, this paper treats generic names competing for use in the order Diaporthales (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes) and makes a recommendation for the use or protection of one generic name among synonymous names that may be either sexually or asexually typified. A table is presented that summarizes these recommendations. Among the genera most commonly encountered in this order, Cytospora is recommended over Valsa and Diaporthe over Phomopsis. New combinations are introduced for the oldest epithet of important species in the recommended genus. These include Amphiporthe tiliae, Coryneum lanciforme, Cytospora brevispora, C. ceratosperma, C. cinereostroma, C. eugeniae, C. fallax, C. myrtagena, Diaporthe amaranthophila, D. annonacearum, D. bougainvilleicola, D. caricae- papayae, D. cocoina, D. cucurbitae, D. juniperivora, D. leptostromiformis, D. pterophila, D. theae, D. vitimegaspora, Mastigosporella georgiana, Pilidiella angustispora, P. calamicola, P. pseudogranati, P. stromatica, and P. terminaliae.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available