4.5 Article

Phylogeny of Hirsutella species (Ophiocordycipitaceae) from the USA: remedying the paucity of Hirsutella sequence data

Journal

IMA FUNGUS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 345-356

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.06

Keywords

18S rDNA; biocontrol; entomopathogenic fungi; Hypocreales; pleomorphic fungi; rpb1; tef1

Categories

Funding

  1. Agricultural and Food Research Initiative Competitive from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2013-67012-21115]
  2. Maine Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station at the University of Maine
  3. NIFA [577659, 2013-67012-21115] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hirsutella (Ophiocordycipitaceae: Hypocreales) is a genus of insect, mite, and nematode pathogens with an asexual morph, which generally produce a mucilaginous cluster of one or several conidia on phialides that are basally subulate and taper to a fine neck. The generic name Hirsutella has been proposed for suppression in favour of Ophiocordyceps as a consequence of the ending of dual nomenclature for different morphs of pleomorphic fungi in 2011. Though the generic name is well established, geographically dispersed, and speciose, exceptionally few sequences are available in online databases. We examined 46 isolates of 23 Hirsutella species from the USA, curated by the USDA-ARS Collection of Entomopathogenic Fungal Cultures (ARSEF Culture Collection), that previously had not been molecularly characterized and produced a phylogeny of these organisms; we included previously published Hirsutella and Ophiocordyceps taxa. In producing the largest phylogeny of Hirsutella isolates so far, we provide: (1) context for discussing previously-hypothesized relationships; (2) evidence for revisions as taxonomic transitions move forward; and (3) available molecular data to be incorporated into further evolutionary studies of Ophiocordycipitaceae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available