4.3 Article

Injectable polyethylene glycol-fibrinogen hydrogel adjuvant improves survival and differentiation of transplanted mesoangioblasts in acute and chronic skeletal-muscle degeneration

Journal

SKELETAL MUSCLE
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/2044-5040-2-24

Keywords

Stem cells; Mesoangioblasts; Hydrogel; Muscular dystrophy; Muscle regeneration; Cell therapy; Tissue engineering

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondazione Roma
  2. Telethon
  3. Duchenne Parent Project Italia
  4. EC-IP FP7 grant Angioscaff
  5. EC-IP FP7 grant Biodesign
  6. EC-IP FP7 grant Optistem
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/J006785/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MR/J006785/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cell-transplantation therapies have attracted attention as treatments for skeletal-muscle disorders; however, such research has been severely limited by poor cell survival. Tissue engineering offers a potential solution to this problem by providing biomaterial adjuvants that improve survival and engraftment of donor cells. Methods: In this study, we investigated the use of intra-muscular transplantation of mesoangioblasts (vessel-associated progenitor cells), delivered with an injectable hydrogel biomaterial directly into the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of acutely injured or dystrophic mice. The hydrogel cell carrier, made from a polyethylene glycol-fibrinogen (PF) matrix, is polymerized in situ together with mesoangioblasts to form a resorbable cellularized implant. Results: Mice treated with PF and mesoangioblasts showed enhanced cell engraftment as a result of increased survival and differentiation compared with the same cell population injected in aqueous saline solution. Conclusion: Both PF and mesoangioblasts are currently undergoing separate clinical trials: their combined use may increase chances of efficacy for localized disorders of skeletal muscle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available