Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio
Dan Jackson et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2018)
Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies
Dean Langan et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2017)
Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2016)
A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis
Mark C. Simmonds et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2016)
Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis
Anna Wiksten et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2016)
Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies
Christian Roever et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2015)
A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice
Mark Simmonds et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2015)
An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12894 meta-analyses
Dean Langan et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2015)
Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change
John E. Cornell et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)
The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
Joanna IntHout et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2014)
Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models
Dan Jackson et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2014)
Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: A simulation study
Putri W. Novianti et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2014)
Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis
Andrew L. Rukhin
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY (2013)
A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses
Evangelos Kontopantelis et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis
Yeojin Chung et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2013)
Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data
Dulal K. Bhaumik et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2012)
Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study
Evangelos Kontopantelis et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2012)
Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A comparison between DerSimonian-Laird and restricted maximum likelihood
Evangelos Kontopantelis et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2012)
Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
Jonathan Davey et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)
Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics
Jack Bowden et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2010)
Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias
Masayuki Henmi et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2010)
Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data
Theo Stijnen et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2010)
Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis
Julio Sanchez-Meca et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2008)
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies
Kurex Sidik et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2007)
Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
Rebecca DerSimonian et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)
Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events
Michael J. Bradburn et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2007)
Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model
W Viechtbauer
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS (2005)
Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta-analysis
K Sidik et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS (2005)
What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data
MJ Sweeting et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2004)
Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate
G Knapp et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2003)
Reducing the number of unjustified significant results in meta-analysis
J Hartung et al.
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION (2003)
Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator
D Böhning et al.
BIOSTATISTICS (2002)
A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis
K Sidik et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
JPT Higgins et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2002)
Being sceptical about meta-analyses: a Bayesian perspective on magnesium trials in myocardial infarction
JPT Higgins et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)
A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome
J Hartung et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2001)
Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of a common mean and the Mandel-Paule algorithm
AL Rukhin et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE (2000)
Nonparametric estimation of heterogeneity variance for the standardised difference used in meta-analysis
U Malzahn et al.
BIOMETRIKA (2000)