4.0 Article

Validity of two brief primary care physical activity questionnaires with accelerometry in clinic staff

Journal

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 100-108

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1463423613000479

Keywords

accelerometry; lifestyle interventions; physical activity; physical activity counseling; primary care; self-report

Funding

  1. Department of Health and Human Services Office on Women's Health [ASTWH070006-01-00]
  2. University of Utah Department of Family and Preventive Medicine
  3. University of Utah Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To date, no physical activity (PA) questionnaires intended for primary care have been compared against a criterion measure of PA and current (2008) aerobic PA recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine/American Heart Association (ACSM/AHA). Aim: This study evaluated preliminary evidence for criterion validity of two brief (<1min) PA questionnaires with accelerometry, and their ability to identify if individuals meet ACSM/AHA PA recommendations. Methods: 45 health clinic staff wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days and afterwards completed two brief PA questionnaires, the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), and the Speedy Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment (SNAP). Agreement and descriptive statistics were calculated between the PAVS or SNAP and accelerometry in order to measure each questionnaire's ability to quantify the number of days participants achieved >= 30 min of moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) performed in bouts of >= 10 continuous minutes. Participants with <5 days of >= 30 bout-min of MVPA were considered insufficiently active according to PA recommendations. Findings: There was a significant positive correlation between number of days with. 30 bout-min MVPA and the PAVS (r=0.52, P<0.001), and SNAP (r=0.31, P<0.05). The PAVS had moderate agreement with accelerometry for identifying if individuals met or did not meet PA recommendations (kappa=0.46, P<0.001), whereas SNAP had poor agreement (kappa=0.12, P<0.05). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence of criterion validity of the PAVS and SNAP with accelerometry and agreement identifying if respondents meet current (2008) ACSM/AHA aerobic PA recommendations. The PAVS and SNAP should be evaluated further for repeatability, and in populations varying in PA levels, age, gender, and ethnicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available