4.3 Article

Quantification of hTERT splice variants in melanoma by SYBR green real-time polymerase chain reaction indicates a negative regulatory role for the β deletion variant

Journal

NEOPLASIA
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 1131-1137

Publisher

NEOPLASIA PRESS
DOI: 10.1593/neo.08644

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Hunter Medical Research Institute
  2. Calvary Mater Newcastle
  3. Coalfields Cancer Support Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telomerase activity is primarily determined by transcriptional regulation of the catalytic subunit, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Several mRNA splice variants for hTERT have been identified, but it is not clear if telomerase activity is determined by the absolute or relative levels of full-length( functional) and variant hTERT transcripts. We have developed an SYBR green-based reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for the enumeration of the four common hTERT mRNA variants and correlated these with telomerase activity and telomere length in 24 human melanoma cell lines. All except five of the lines expressed four hTERT transcripts, with an overall significant level of co-occurrence between absolute mRNA levels of full-length alpha+/beta+ hTERT and the three splice variants alpha-/beta+, alpha+/beta-, and alpha-/beta-. On average, alpha+/beta+ made up the majority (48.1%) of transcripts, followed by alpha+/beta- (44.6%), alpha-/beta- (4.4%), and alpha-/beta+ (2.9%). Telomerase activity ranged from 1 to 247 relative telomerase activity and correlated most strongly with the absolute amount of alpha+/beta+ (R = 0.791, P = .000004) and the relative amount of alpha+/beta- (R = -0.465, P = .022). This study shows that telomerase activity in melanoma cells is best determined by the absolute expression of full-length hTERT mRNA and indicates a role for the hTERT beta deletion variant in the negative regulation of enzyme activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available