4.7 Article

Phenotypic comparison of common mouse strains developing high-fat diet-induced hepatosteatosis

Journal

MOLECULAR METABOLISM
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 435-446

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.07.009

Keywords

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Inflammation; Oxidative stress; Thyroid metabolism; Insulin resistance; Cancer

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [NGFN-Plus: 01GS0850, 01GS0851, Infrafrontier: 01KX1012]
  2. BMBF [0315494A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic predisposition and environmental factors contribute to an individual's susceptibility to develop hepatosteatosis. In a systematic, comparative survey we focused on genotype-dependent and-independent adaptations early in the pathogenesis of hepatosteatosis by characterizing C3HeB/FeJ, C57BL/6NTac, C57BL/6J, and 129P2/OlaHsd mice after 7, 14, or 21 days high-fat-diet exposure. Strain-specific metabolic responses during diet challenge and liver transcript signatures in mild hepatosteatosis outline the suitability of particular strains for investigating the relationship between hepatocellular lipid content and inflammation, glucose homeostasis, insulin action, or organelle physiology. Genetic background-independent transcriptional adaptations in liver paralleling hepatosteatosis suggest an early increase in the organ's vulnerability to oxidative stress damage what could advance hepatosteatosis to steatohepatitis. Universal adaptations in transcript signatures and transcription factor regulation in liver link insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cancer, and thyroid hormone metabolism with hepatosteatosis, hence, facilitating the search for novel molecular mechanisms potentially implicated in the pathogenesis of human non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All nghts reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available