4.6 Article

What makes a material printable? A viscoelastic model for extrusion-based 3D printing of polymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 526-537

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.008

Keywords

3D printing; Extrusion; Fused filament fabrication (FFF); Thermoplastic polymers; Viscoelastic model

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. UT-Battelle, LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a practical model for evaluating polymer feedstock materials as candidates for 3D printing across a variety of extrusion-based platforms. In order for a material to be successfully utilized for 3D printing operations, a series of fundamental conditions must be met. First, pressure-driven extrusion must occur through a given diameter nozzle at a specified flow rate. Second, the extruded material must form and sustain the desired shape. Third, the extruded structure must be able to bridge a specified gap and serve as a mechanically sound foundation for successive deposits. Finally, the deposited structure must be dimensionally stable during the transition to the final state (i.e. fully cured at room temperature). This article presents a framework for extrusionbased printing and a simple viscoelastic model for each of these conditions based on the rheological and thermophysical properties of the candidate material and the processing parameters of the extrusion-based deposition platform. The model is demonstrated to be a useful tool for the evaluation of example test cases including: high temperature thermoplastics (polyphenylsulfone), fiber reinforced thermoplastics (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), low-viscosity thermosets (epoxy resins), and thermoplastics with a high coefficient of thermal expansion (polypropylene).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available