4.5 Article

Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol 100-25 mcg Compared with Fluticasone Furoate 100 mcg in Asthma: A Randomized Trial

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.02.010

Keywords

Asthma; Efficacy; Fluticasone furoate; Randomized trial; Safety; Tolerability; Vilanterol

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [GSK HZA106827]
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10040, NF-SI-0510-10249] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) in combination with the long-acting beta(2)-agonist vilanterol (VI) is under development for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of FF-VI and FF in patients (>= 12 years old) with persistent asthma. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (n = 609) (intent-to-treat population) received FF-VI 100-25 mcg, FF 100 mcg, or placebo once daily (evening) by using a dry powder inhaler for 12 weeks. Coprimary end points were change from baseline in trough FEV1 and serial (0-24 hours) weighted mean FEV1 (wmFEV(1)). Rescue-free 24-hour periods and safety also were assessed. RESULTS: Placebo increased trough FEV1 (196 mL) and wmFEV(1) (212 mL) versus baseline. Compared with placebo, FF-VI and FF significantly improved trough FEV1 (172 mL [P<.001] and 136mL [P = .002]), respectively, and serial wmFEV(1) (302mL[P<.001] and 186 mL [P = .003]), respectively. Treatment differences between FF-VI and FF approached significance for serial wmFEV(1) (116 mL; P = .060) but not for trough FEV1 (36 mL; P = .405). The percentage of rescue-free 24-hour periods with FF-VI was 10.6% greater than FF and 19.3% greater than placebo. Statistically significant (P = .032) urinary cortisol suppression was observed with FF-VI (ratio, 0.82) relative to placebo, but not with FF. Adverse event and safety profiles were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in lung function was observed with FF-VI and FF versus placebo in patients with persistent asthma. Improvement of FEV1 when VI was added to FF was not significant. The high placebo response in evening trough FEV1 may have influenced the assessment of efficacy. (C) 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available