4.5 Article

Femtosecond X-ray diffraction from two-dimensional protein crystals

Journal

IUCRJ
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages 95-100

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2052252514001444

Keywords

two-dimensional protein crystal; femtosecond crystallography; single layer X-ray diffraction; membrane protein

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  3. UCOP Lab Fee Program [118036]
  4. NIH [5RC1GM091755]
  5. NSF award [MCB-1021557]
  6. NSF STC award [1231306]
  7. LLNL Lab-Directed Research and Development Project [012-ERD-031]
  8. PNNL Chemical Imaging Initiative
  9. Center for Biophotonics Science and Technology, NSF Science and Technology Center [PHY0120999]
  10. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [1021557] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

X-ray diffraction patterns from two-dimensional (2-D) protein crystals obtained using femtosecond X-ray pulses from an X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) are presented. To date, it has not been possible to acquire transmission X-ray diffraction patterns from individual 2-D protein crystals due to radiation damage. However, the intense and ultrafast pulses generated by an XFEL permit a new method of collecting diffraction data before the sample is destroyed. Utilizing a diffract-before-destroy approach at the Linac Coherent Light Source, Bragg diffraction was acquired to better than 8.5 angstrom resolution for two different 2-D protein crystal samples each less than 10 nm thick and maintained at room temperature. These proof-of-principle results show promise for structural analysis of both soluble and membrane proteins arranged as 2-D crystals without requiring cryogenic conditions or the formation of three-dimensional crystals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available