4.6 Article

Five eIF4E isoforms from Arabidopsis thaliana are characterized by distinct features of cap analogs binding

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.11.032

Keywords

eIF4E; Cap analog; Binding affinity; Fluorescence titration; Homology modeling

Funding

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [UMO-2012/07/B/NZ1/00118, UMO-2011/02/A/NZ2/00014, UMO-2012/05/E/ST5/03893]
  2. Foundation For Polish Science [TEAM/2010-6]
  3. National Centre for Research and Development (Poland) [PBS1/A9/16/2012]
  4. European Social Fund (EU) [UDA-POKL.04.01.01-00-072/09-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assembly of the ribosome on majority of eukaryotic mRNAs is initiated by the recruitment of eIF4E protein to the mRNA 5' end cap structure. Flowering plants use two eIF4E isoforms, named eIF4E and eIF(iso)4E, as canonical translation initiation factors and possess a homolog of mammalian 4EHP (or eIF4E-2) termed nCBP. Plants from Brassicaceae family additionally conserve a close paralog of eIF4E which in Arabidopsis thaliana has two copies named eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c. In order to assess the efficiency of plant non-canonical (eIF4E1b/1c and nCBP) and canonical (eIF4E and eIF(iso)4E) eIF4E proteins to bind mRNAs we utilized fluorescence titrations to determine accurate binding affinities of five A. thaliana eIF4E isoforms for a series of cap analogs. We found that eIF4E binds cap analogs from 4-fold to 10-fold stronger than eIF(iso)4E, while binding affinities of nCBP and eIF(iso)4E are comparable. Furthermore, eIF4E1c interacts similarly strongly with the cap as eIF4E, but eIF4E1b binds cap analogs ca. 2-fold weaker than eIF4E1c, regardless of the 95% sequence identity between these two proteins. The use of differentially chemically modified cap analogs in binding studies and a detailed analysis of the obtained homology models gave us insight into the molecular characteristic of varying cap-binding abilities of Arabidopsis eIF4E isoforms. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available