4.4 Article

Using Google Location History data to quantify fine-scale human mobility

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12942-018-0150-z

Keywords

Human mobility; Mobile phone data; GPS tracker data

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1182408, OPP1106427, 1032350, OPP1134076, OPP1170969]
  2. Clinton Health Access Initiative
  3. DFID
  4. Wellcome Trust [204613/Z/16/Z]
  5. UK Economic and Social Research Council
  6. National Institutes of Health
  7. Wellcome Trust Sustaining Health Grant [106866/Z/15/Z]
  8. Wellcome Trust [204613/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  9. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1182408, OPP1170969] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Human mobility is fundamental to understanding global issues in the health and social sciences such as disease spread and displacements from disasters and conflicts. Detailed mobility data across spatial and temporal scales are difficult to collect, however, with movements varying from short, repeated movements to work or school, to rare migratory movements across national borders. While typical sources of mobility data such as travel history surveys and GPS tracker data can inform different typologies of movement, almost no source of readily obtainable data can address all types of movement at once. Methods: Here, we collect Google Location History (GLH) data and examine it as a novel source of information that could link fine scale mobility with rare, long distance and international trips, as it uniquely spans large temporal scales with high spatial granularity. These data are passively collected by Android smartphones, which reach increasingly broad audiences, becoming the most common operating system for accessing the Internet worldwide in 2017. We validate GLH data against GPS tracker data collected from Android users in the United Kingdom to assess the feasibility of using GLH data to inform human movement. Results: We find that GLH data span very long temporal periods (over a year on average in our sample), are spatially equivalent to GPS tracker data within 100 m, and capture more international movement than survey data. We also find GLH data avoid compliance concerns seen with GPS trackers and bias in self-reported travel, as GLH is passively collected. We discuss some settings where GLH data could provide novel insights, including infrastructure planning, infectious disease control, and response to catastrophic events, and discuss advantages and disadvantages of using GLH data to inform human mobility patterns. Conclusions: GLH data are a greatly underutilized and novel dataset for understanding human movement. While biases exist in populations with GLH data, Android phones are becoming the first and only device purchased to access the Internet and various web services in many middle and lower income settings, making these data increasingly appropriate for a wide range of scientific questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available