4.6 Review

Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002

Keywords

Risk; Hazard; Interpretation; Decision; Trust

Funding

  1. International Council for Science (ICSU)
  2. International Social Science Council (ISSC)
  3. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding how people interpret risks and choose actions based on their interpretations is vital to any strategy for disaster reduction. We review relevant literature with the aim of developing a conceptual framework to guide future research in this area. We stress that risks in the context of natural hazards always involve interactions between natural (physical) and human (behavioural) factors. Decision-making under conditions of uncertainty is inadequately described by traditional models of 'rational choice'. Instead, attention needs to be paid to how people's interpretations of risks are shaped by their own experience, personal feelings and values, cultural beliefs and interpersonal and societal dynamics. Furthermore, access to information and capacity for self-protection are typically distributed unevenly within populations. Hence trust is a critical moderator of the effectiveness of any policy for risk communication and public engagement. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available