4.6 Article

Ionic Conductive Polyurethane-Graphene Nanocomposite for Performance Enhancement of Optical Fiber Bragg, Grating Temperature Sensor

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 47355-47363

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2867220

Keywords

Fiber Bragg grating; graphene; polyurethane; temperature sensor

Funding

  1. KGC Sdn. Bhd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyurethane-graphene (PU-graphene) nanocomposite was utilized as the sensing material for a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) temperature sensor. The nanocomposite was characterized using a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to study the morphology and physical properties of the materials for FBG temperature sensing application. The physical, chemical, and conductivity of PU-graphene improve after graphene was introduced in pristine PU. The FTIR shows that the strong intermolecular interaction between -O-C = O (ester) and hydrogen in graphene in the PU-graphene was indicated by the shift to lower wavenumber of ether (C-O-C) peak at similar to 1220 cm(-1) to similar to 1218 cm(-1). TGA shows the thermal stability of PU increases to 217 degrees C due to the strong intermolecular interaction with the presence of graphene flakes. EIS shows a good electrical conductivity of 1.39 x 10(-9) Scm(-1) in the PU-graphene due to the electron transfer provided by the graphene. The SEM shows a rough and uneven texture on the surface of FBG coated by PU-graphene nanocomposite which shows that the graphene flakes are completely coated by polyurethane polymer. The PU-graphene was then dip-coated on the optical fiber-based Bragg grating, and the sensor performance for a temperature sensor was evaluated, where a good linearity with the sensitivity of 6 pm/degrees C was achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available