4.8 Article

Myeloid-Specific Deletion of Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4 Mitigates Atherosclerosis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01680

Keywords

atherosclerosis; neutrophil extracellular traps; peptidylarginine deiminase 4; inflammation; macrophages

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program (NIAMS/NIH) [ZIA ZIAAR041199]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL002058] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [T32AR007080, ZIAAR041199] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence suggests that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) may play a role in promoting atherosclerotic plaque lesions in humans and in murine models. The exact pathways involved in NET-driven atherogenesis remain to be systematically characterized. To assess the extent to which myeloid-specific peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) and PAD4-dependent NET formation contribute to atherosclerosis, mice with myeloid-specific deletion of PAD4 were generated and backcrossed to Apoe(-/-) mice. The kinetics of atherosclerosis development were determined. NETs, but not macrophage extracellular traps, were present in atherosclerotic lesions as early as 3 weeks after initiating high-fat chow. The presence of NETs was associated with the development of atherosclerosis and with inflammatory responses in the aorta. Specific deletion of PAD4 in the myeloid lineage significantly reduced atherosclerosis burden in association with diminished NET formation and reduced inflammatory responses in the aorta. NETs stimulated macrophages to synthesize inflammatory mediators, including IL-1 beta, CCL2, CXCL1, and CXCL2. Our data support the notion that NETs promote atherosclerosis and that the use of specific PAD4 inhibitors may have therapeutic benefits in this potentially devastating condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available