4.8 Review

Immunity and tolerance to fungi in hematopoietic transplantation: principles and perspectives

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00156

Keywords

fungal infections; resistance; tolerance; IDO; single nucleotide polymorphism

Categories

Funding

  1. Specific Targeted Research Project FUNMETA [ERC-2011-AdG-293714]
  2. Gilead Sciences S.r.l.
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/BPD/46292/2008, SFRH/BD/65962/2009]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/65962/2009, SFRH/BPD/46292/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resistance and tolerance are two complementary host defense mechanisms that increase fitness in response to low-virulence fungi. Resistance is meant to reduce pathogen burden during infection through innate and adaptive immune mechanisms, whereas tolerance mitigates the substantial cost of resistance to host fitness through a multitude of anti-inflammatory mechanisms, including immunological tolerance. In experimental fungal infections, both defense mechanisms are activated through the delicate equilibrium between Th1/1h17 cells, which provide antifungal resistance, and regulatory T cells limiting the consequences of the ensuing inflammatory pathology. lndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), a rate-limiting enzyme in the tryptophan catabolism, plays a key role in induction of tolerance against fungi. Both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic compartments contribute to the resistance/tolerance balance against Aspergillus fumigatus via the involvement of selected innate receptors converging on IDO. Several genetic polymorphisms in pattern recognition receptors influence resistance and tolerance to fungal infections in human hematopoietic transplantation. Thus, tolerance mechanisms may be exploited for novel diagnostics and therapeutics against fungal infections and diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available