4.7 Article

Light Absorption by Charge Transfer Complexes in Brown Carbon Aerosols

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 1, Issue 10, Pages 382-386

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ez500263j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AGS-1241621]
  2. Henry Luce Foundation's Clare Boothe Luce Program
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1241621] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, it has become apparent that a fraction of the organic species in ambient aerosols absorbs ultraviolet visible light with a potential impact on climate. It is believed that this light-absorbing, sometimes called brown, carbon originates from biomass and biofiiel burning and could be formed through secondary processes in particles or clouds. Here, we identify for the first time charge transfer (CT) complexes as a significant source of light absorption by organic compounds in aerosols. A dense manifold of these complexes, formed from interactions between alcohol and carbonyl moieties, accounts for approximately 50% of the absorption (300-600 nm) observed for water-extracted ambient particulate matter collected in Athens, GA. Corresponding fluorescence emission spectra with broad, overlapping long-wavelength tails are consistent with efficient energy transfer among a near continuum of such coupled excited states. We postulate that a wide variety of CT complexes are formed as a result of a supramolecular association of self-assembling, smaller molecules, just as they are in natural humic substances, and that this gives rise to absorption that extends to red wavelengths. These findings imply that light absorption by organic aerosols is governed by a combination of independent as well as interacting chromophores and that both must be included in an accurate representation of aerosol optical properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available