4.7 Article

Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic

Journal

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 110-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001

Keywords

Ecosystems; Ecosystem services; Integrated assessment; Database; Valuation; Czech Republic

Funding

  1. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TD010066]
  2. Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Czech Republic
  3. Czech Globe - Centre for Global Climate Change Impacts Studies [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mainstreaming the concept of ecosystem services has been receiving increasing attention in recent years. Initially, most studies on ecosystem services assessments addressed global, sub-global or local levels. More recently, development of ecosystem services assessments at national level has been emphasized. Following this trend, integrated assessment of ecosystem services has been performed in the Czech Republic. Our study aimed to identify and value ecosystem services delivered in the Czech Republic To estimate the total value of Czech ecosystems, we developed a geographically specific database of ecosystem service values. The structure of the assessment is given by six ecosystem types (agricultural ecosystems, grasslands, forests, aquatic ecosystems, wetlands and urban areas) and 17 ecosystem services delivered from these ecosystems. Ecosystem types are further classified into 41 ecosystem categories based on a habitat approach. Specific literature review strategy was conducted to fill the database with biophysical and economic values of ecosystem services. Developed database consists of more than 190 values of ecosystem services, approximately half of them has been used for a benefit transfer to calculate total ecosystem values in the Czech Republic. The resulting average value of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic represents 1.5 the current national GNP (gross national product). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available