4.2 Editorial Material

Commentary: The Five Ws of a Fracture Liaison Service: Why, Who, What, Where, and How? In Osteoporosis, We Reap What We Sow

Journal

CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 365-368

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11914-013-0177-9

Keywords

Fracture Liaison Service; FLS; Osteoporosis management; Fracture; Risk; Fragility fracture

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [K23 AR053351] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishing a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) to identify and treat patients with a recent fragility fracture has been shown to be effective, save money, useful to document high quality of care, and makes good clinical sense. A FLS starts with an osteoporosis champion and encompasses identification of patients with a recent fracture, diagnostic workup, treatment, and follow-up. A FLS is most effective when it is able to function in multiple settings: the hospital, emergency department, and outpatient clinic. Implementation may be somewhat easier in a closed healthcare system but can be feasible even in an open system. There are many barriers to implementation which can be addressed. The future of FLS care lies in a collaborative systems-based approach with appropriate stakeholder engagement, leading to seamless integration of osteoporosis care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available