Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
Jigisha Patel
BMC MEDICINE (2014)
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
Sally Hopewell et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the course of aminotransferase elevation during prolonged acetaminophen administration
Kennon Heard et al.
BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY (2014)
Biology direct: celebrating 7 years of open, published peer review
Eugene V. Koonin et al.
BIOLOGY DIRECT (2013)
Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities
Roger Chun-Man Ho et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2013)
Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers
Adrian Mulligan et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Peering into peer-review at GigaScience
Scott C. Edmunds
GIGASCIENCE (2013)
Predatory publishers are corrupting open access
Jeffrey Beall
NATURE (2012)
Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review
Satrajit S. Ghosh et al.
FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE (2012)
Only connect: the merger of BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology
Elizabeth C. Moylan et al.
BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY (2012)
Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
Susan van Rooyen et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)