3.8 Article

Micromachining of Polyurethane Membranes for Tissue Engineering Applications

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 3522-3533

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00578

Keywords

femtosecond laser machining; thin polyurethane membrane; micropore generation; air-liquid interface

Funding

  1. DTRA Interagency Agreement (IA) [CMBXCEL-XLI-2-0001]
  2. Applied Modern Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engineered tissue barrier models offer in vitro alternatives in toxicology and disease research. To mimic barrier tissue microenvironment, a porous membrane that can approach the stiffness of physiological basement membranes is required. While several biocompatible membranes with micrometer range thickness (10 pm) and a stiffness less than polystyrene (3 GPa) or polyethylene (PET, 2 GPa), have been developed, there has been little effort to optimize the process to enable rapid and reproducible pore production in these membranes. Here, we investigate the use of laser irradiation with femtosecond (fs) pulses because the combination of high-precision and cold ablation causes minimal damage to polymeric membranes. This process enables automated, high-throughput and reproducible fabrication of thin, microporous membranes that can be utilized to culture cells at air liquid interface (ALI), a unique culture technique that simulates the tissue-barrier microenvironment. We show the optimization of laser parameters on a thin polyurethane membrane and patterned pores with an average diameter of 5 pm. Tissue was cultured at ALI for 28 days to demonstrate the membrane's utility in constructing a tissue barrier model. These results confirm the utilization of fs laser machining as a viable method for creating a porous barrier substrate in tissue engineering platforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available