4.3 Review

Microbial maceration: a sustainable approach for phytochemical extraction

Journal

3 BIOTECH
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1423-8

Keywords

Microbial maceration; Phytochemical extraction; Bioactive compounds

Funding

  1. Lovely Professional University, Phagwara (Punjab), India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid change in the lifestyle has witnessed poor health with the increased incidences of numerous diseases in the recent years, and ultimately increasing the demand of nutritious foods containing phytochemicals. A wide range of phytochemicals (secondary metabolites) is being synthesized in plants, which influence the human health upon consumption as dietary component. Recently, a number of the technologies (conventional and non-conventional methods) have been standardized by the different researchers for the extraction of these phytochemicals depending upon the raw material. However, selection of extraction method for commercial use depends upon various factors such as extraction efficiency, time required, and cost of operation. Considering these factors, microbial maceration is one of the viable approaches which is easy to handle, cost-effective, energy efficient, less hazardous and having high extraction rate. Recently, researchers have utilized this technique for the maceration of different plant-based substrates (such as legumes, cereals, pulses, fruits and vegetables) and their respective wastes for the efficient extraction of numerous phytochemicals with increased efficiency. However, scale up studies and analysis of toxic compounds produced by microbes are still a lacking field and need to be explored further by the researchers and industrialists to bring it into reality. Therefore, the present review aims to document the recent findings related to microbial maceration in a crisp way to provide the complete information to the readers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available