4.6 Article

Recapitulation of Human Neural Microenvironment Signatures in iPSC-Derived NPC 3D Differentiation

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 552-564

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.06.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia/Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia [UID/Multi/04462/2013]
  2. FEDER
  3. FCT, Portugal [PD/BD/52473/2014, PD/BD/52481/2014, PD/BD/128371/2017]
  4. European Research Council [337327]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SA 1382/7-1]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [337327] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/52473/2014, PD/BD/52481/2014, PD/BD/128371/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain microenvironment plays an important role in neurodevelopment and pathology, where the extracellular matrix (ECM) and soluble factors modulate multiple cellular processes. Neural cell culture typically relies on heterologous matrices poorly resembling brain ECM. Here, we employed neurospheroids to address microenvironment remodeling during neural differentiation of human stem cells, without the confounding effects of exogenous matrices. Proteome and transcriptome dynamics revealed significant changes at cell membrane and ECM during 3D differentiation, diverging significantly from the 2D differentiation. Structural proteoglycans typical of brain ECM were enriched during 3D differentiation, in contrast to basement membrane constituents in 2D. Moreover, higher expression of synaptic and ion transport machinery was observed in 3D cultures, suggesting higher neuronal maturation in neurospheroids. This work demonstrates that 3D neural differentiation as neurospheroids promotes the expression of cellular and extracellular features found in neural tissue, highlighting its value to address molecular defects in cell-ECM interactions associated with neurological disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available