4.1 Article

Molecular taxonomy and identification within the Antarctic genus Trematomus (Notothenioidei, Teleostei): How valuable is barcoding with COI?

Journal

POLAR SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 333-352

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2010.04.006

Keywords

Barcode; Molecular taxonomy; Southern Ocean; Pagothenia

Funding

  1. Consortium National de Recherche en Genomique
  2. 'Service de Systematique Moleculaire' of the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle [UMS 2700]
  3. Australian Antarctic Division
  4. Japanese Science Foundation
  5. French polar institute Institut Paul-Emile Victor
  6. Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique
  7. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
  8. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [07-BLAN-0213-01]
  9. National Science Foundation [OPP 01-32032]
  10. European Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Trematominae are a particularly interesting subfamily within the antarctic suborder Notothenioidei (Teleostei). The 14 closely related species occupy a large range of ecological of niches, extremely useful for evolutionary and biogeography studies in the Antarctic Ocean. But some Trematomus species can be difficult to identify by using morphological criteria, specially young stages and damaged specimens. Molecular identification would therefore be highly useful, however the suitability of the cytochrome oxidase I gene in a barcoding approach needs to be assessed. We evaluated species delineation within the genus Trematomus comparing morphological identification, nuclear markers (the rhodopsin retrogene and a new nuclear marker pkd1: polycystic kidney disease 1) and COI. We show that Trematomus vicarius is not distinguishable from Trematomus bernacchii with the molecular markers used, and neither is Trematomus loennbergii from Trematomus lepidorhinus. We suggest that until this is investigated further, studies including these species list them as T. loennbergii/T. lepidorhinus group, and keep voucher samples and specimens. Generally, COI gives a congruent result with the rhodopsin retrogene, and except for the previously cited species pairs, COI barcoding is efficient for identification in this group. Moreover pkd1 might not be suitable for a phylogenetic study at this scale for this group. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. and NIPR. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available