4.8 Review

Birth of the Yangtze River: age and tectonic-geomorphic implications

Journal

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 438-453

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwv063

Keywords

Yangtze River; evolutionary history; Tibetan Plateau; Oligocene/Miocene; tectonic geomorphology

Funding

  1. 'Strategic Priority Research Program' of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB03020301]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [NSFC 40830107, 41111140016, 41102104]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large river systems are an integral and essential component of Earth dynamics. The development of large river systems in Asia is closely linked to the evolving topography driven by both near-field and far-field effects of the interplay among Indian, Eurasian and Pacific plates. Plate tectonics together with climatic changes during the Cenozoic is therefore believed to have determined the evolution of Asian large rivers, yet the age of the Yangtze, the largest in Asia, has been strongly debated over a century, with estimates ranging from 40-45 Ma to a more recent initiation postdating 750 ka. In this paper, I attempt to review the competing views about the age of the Yangtze, and evaluate the estimated pre-Miocene birth of the river based on the provenance of the fluvial sediments from the lower reaches. I further present new geological evidence from the upper stream in southeastern Tibetan Plateau to show the existence of a possible southward paleo-Jinshajiang during the Paleogene, and exploit when and how it might deviated eastward to give birth to the modern Yangtze River. I propose that the present Yangtze River system formed in response to the continental-scale gradient driven by uplifting Tibetan Plateau and regional extension throughout eastern synchronous with surface uplift in southeastern Tibet and strengthening of Asian summer monsoon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available