4.4 Article

Analysis of Oxidative Stress in Zebrafish Embryos

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 89, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/51328

Keywords

Developmental Biology; Issue 89; Danio rerio; zebrafish embryos; endothelial cells; redox state analysis; oxidative stress detection; in vivo ROS measurements; FACS (fluorescence activated cell sorter); molecular probes

Funding

  1. HFSP
  2. Marie Curie Action
  3. Telethon
  4. AIRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) may cause a change of cellular redox state towards oxidative stress condition. This situation causes oxidation of molecules (lipid, DNA, protein) and leads to cell death. Oxidative stress also impacts the progression of several pathological conditions such as diabetes, retinopathies, neurodegeneration, and cancer. Thus, it is important to define tools to investigate oxidative stress conditions not only at the level of single cells but also in the context of whole organisms. Here, we consider the zebrafish embryo as a useful in vivo system to perform such studies and present a protocol to measure in vivo oxidative stress. Taking advantage of fluorescent ROS probes and zebrafish transgenic fluorescent lines, we develop two different methods to measure oxidative stress in vivo: i) a whole embryo ROS-detection method for qualitative measurement of oxidative stress and ii) a single-cell ROS detection method for quantitative measurements of oxidative stress. Herein, we demonstrate the efficacy of these procedures by increasing oxidative stress in tissues by oxidant agents and physiological or genetic methods. This protocol is amenable for forward genetic screens and it will help address cause-effect relationships of ROS in animal models of oxidative stress-related pathologies such as neurological disorders and cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available