4.1 Article

Impact of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Depression on Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults

Journal

INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 132-138

Publisher

KOREAN CONTINENCE SOC
DOI: 10.5213/inj.2012.16.3.132

Keywords

Lower urinary tract symptoms; Depression; Quality of life; Aged

Funding

  1. Jeju National University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We aimed primarily to investigate the level of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and depression in older adults and secondly to identify the impact of LUTS and depression on HRQoL. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to November 2010. Participants were recruited from five community senior centers serving community dwelling older adults in Jeju city. Data analysis was based on 171 respondents. A structured questionnaire was used to guide interviews; the data were collected including demographic characteristics, body mass index, adherence to regular exercise, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and osteoarthritis), depression, urinary incontinence, LUTS (measured via the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]), and HRQoL as assessed by use of the EQ-5D Index. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to test predictors of HRQoL. Results: Eighteen percent (18.6%) of the respondents reported depressive symptoms. The mean LUTS score was 8.9 (IPSS range, 0 to 35). The severity of LUTS, was reported to be mild (score, 0 to 7) by 53% of the respondents, moderate (score, 8 to 19) by 34.5%, and severe (score, 20 to 35) by 12.5%. HRQoL was significantly predicted by depression (Partial R-2=0.193, P<0.01) and LUTS (Partial R-2=0.048, P=0.0047), and 24% of the variance in HRQoL was explained. Conclusions: LUTS and depression were the principal predictors of HRQoL in older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available