4.5 Article

Synchronous-Logic and Asynchronous-Logic 8051 Microcontroller Cores for Realizing the Internet of Things: A Comparative Study on Dynamic Voltage Scaling and Variation Effects

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2243031

Keywords

Asynchronous logic; dynamic voltage scaling; microcontrollers; ubiquitous sensors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microcontrollers play a vital role in embodying intelligence into battery-powered everyday objects to realize the internet of things (IoT). The desirable attributes of such a microcontroller and the like include high energy and area efficiency, and robust error-free operation under dynamic voltage scaling (DVS), workload, process, voltage, and temperature (PVT) variation effects. In this work, a synchronous-logic and a quasi-delay-insensitive asynchronous-logic 8051 microcontroller core are designed and fabricated for full-range DVS from nominal to deep sub-threshold. The performance of the and are largely comparable at nominal conditions and the entire DVS range, but differs when PVT and workload are varied. At nominal, both the microcontroller cores feature comparable energy and speed, with the electromagnetic interference of the lower and the area larger than the. When DVS is applied, both the microcontroller cores feature comparable energy and speed; the requires simultaneous adjustment of clock frequency with. At wide PVT variations, up to delay margins are required for the, whereas the operates at actual speed. When the workload of both microcontrollers is varied, the features lower energy dissipation per workload due to the exploitation of its asynchronous-logic protocols. For IoT applications that incur wide PVT and workload variations, is more suitable due to its self-timed nature, whereas when PVT and workload variations are less severe, is more suitable due to a smaller IC area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available