4.6 Review

DNA Methylation Biomarkers: Cancer and Beyond

Journal

GENES
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 821-864

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes5030821

Keywords

cancer; diabetes; obesity; smoking; stress; autism; schizophrenia; bipolar disorder; depression; environmental factors

Funding

  1. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute (MCRI)
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. Australian Twin Registry
  5. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomarkers are naturally-occurring characteristics by which a particular pathological process or disease can be identified or monitored. They can reflect past environmental exposures, predict disease onset or course, or determine a patient's response to therapy. Epigenetic changes are such characteristics, with most epigenetic biomarkers discovered to date based on the epigenetic mark of DNA methylation. Many tissue types are suitable for the discovery of DNA methylation biomarkers including cell-based samples such as blood and tumor material and cell-free DNA samples such as plasma. DNA methylation biomarkers with diagnostic, prognostic and predictive power are already in clinical trials or in a clinical setting for cancer. Outside cancer, strong evidence that complex disease originates in early life is opening up exciting new avenues for the detection of DNA methylation biomarkers for adverse early life environment and for estimation of future disease risk. However, there are a number of limitations to overcome before such biomarkers reach the clinic. Nevertheless, DNA methylation biomarkers have great potential to contribute to personalized medicine throughout life. We review the current state of play for DNA methylation biomarkers, discuss the barriers that must be crossed on the way to implementation in a clinical setting, and predict their future use for human disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available