4.6 Article

NOX4-dependent hydrogen peroxide overproduction in human atrial fibrillation and HL-1 atrial cells: relationship to hypertension

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00140

Keywords

atrial fibrillation; hydrogen peroxide; NADPH oxidase; NOX4; hypertension; HL-1 cells; angiotensin II

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [HD077440, HL081571, HL088975, HL101228, HL108701]
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL088975, R01HL077440] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Objectives:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia with patients dying frequently of stroke. In view of the unclear etiologies of AF and a potential role of oxidative stress, the present study examined cardiac reactive oxygen species production and NADPH oxidase (NOX) expression in AF patients. Methods and Results: Patients with AF were older than those without (58.8 +/- 11.7 vs. 478 +/- 19.2, p = 0.047). Whereas total O-2(center dot-) production (determined by electron spin resonance) was similar in patients with and without AF, H2O2 production was more than doubled in AF patients (149.8 +/- 26.28 vs. 66.9 +/- 7.14 pmol/mg/min, p = 0.0055), which correlated well with a doubling in NOX isoform 4 (NOX4) expression. AF patients with co-existing hypertension had three-fold higher H2O2 production compared to those without (239.0 +/- 125.1 vs. 83.6 +/- 51.3 pmol/mg/min, p = 0.003). Treatment of HL-1 atrial cells with angiotensin II, a known modulator of atrial structural remodeling, resulted in upregulation of NOX4 and H2O2 production, further implicating a potential role of NOX4 in atrial remodeling. Conclusion: Our data represent the first implication that NOX4-derived H2O2 may play an important role in the etiologies of AF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available