4.7 Review

Biologically Targeted Magnetic Hyperthermia: Potential and Limitations

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00831

Keywords

magnetic hyperthermia; targeted therapy; iron oxide nanoparticles; cancer therapy; magnetic nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Children's Cancer Institute
  2. University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)
  3. Sydney Children's Hospital Network
  4. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  5. RANZCR Genito-Urinary Fellowship Grant
  6. Tolmar Australia Pty Ltd
  7. NHMRC [APP1119152, APP1091261]
  8. Cancer Council New South Wales Program Grant [PG16-01]
  9. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology [CE140100036]
  10. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hyperthermia, the mild elevation of temperature to 40-43 degrees C, can induce cancer cell death and enhance the effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, achievement of its full potential as a clinically relevant treatment modality has been restricted by its inability to effectively and preferentially heat malignant cells. The limited spatial resolution may be circumvented by the intravenous administration of cancer-targeting magnetic nanoparticles that accumulate in the tumor, followed by the application of an alternating magnetic field to raise the temperature of the nanoparticles located in the tumor tissue. This targeted approach enables preferential heating of malignant cancer cells whilst sparing the surrounding normal tissue, potentially improving the effectiveness and safety of hyperthermia. Despite promising results in preclinical studies, there are numerous challenges that must be addressed before this technique can progress to the clinic. This review discusses these challenges and highlights the current understanding of targeted magnetic hyperthermia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available