4.5 Article

Brain extraction using the watershed transform from markers

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00032

Keywords

brain extraction; scalping; watershed transform from markers; human brain extraction; macaque brain extraction; mathematical morphology; Insight Toolkit

Funding

  1. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital
  2. University of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics
  3. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  4. MRC (UK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isolation of the brain from other tissue types in magnetic resonance (MR) images is an important step in many types of neuro-imaging research using both humans and animal subjects. The importance of brain extraction is well appreciated-numerous approaches have been published and the benefits of good extraction methods to subsequent processing are well known. We describe a tool the marker based watershed scalper (MBWSS)-for isolating the brain in T1-weighted MR images built using filtering and segmentation components from the Insight Toolkit (ITK) framework. The key elements of MBWSS the watershed transform from markers and aggressive filtering with large kernels are techniques that have rarely been used in neuroimaging segmentation applications. MBWSS is able to reliably isolate the brain without expensive preprocessing steps, such as registration to an atlas, and is therefore useful as the first stage of processing pipelines. It is an informative example of the level of accuracy achievable without using priors in the form of atlases, shape models or libraries of examples. We validate the MBWSS using a publicly available dataset, a paediatric cohort, an adolescent cohort, intra-surgical scans and demonstrate flexibility of the approach by modifying the method to extract macaque brains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available