4.3 Article

Identification of condition-specific reference genes from microarray data for locusts exposed to hypobaric hypoxia

Journal

FEBS OPEN BIO
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages 235-240

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.fob.2012.08.001

Keywords

Real-time quantitative PCR; Reference gene; Microarray; Hypobaric hypoxia; Locusta migratoria

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070366, 30970407]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB114102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a routine and robust approach for measuring gene expression. The stability of reference genes in qPCR is crucial for the accurate quantification of gene expression. To provide reliable reference genes for studying the transcriptional responses of locust muscles to hypobaric hypoxia, we first examined the gene expression stability of the frequently used housekeeping genes 18S, GAPDH, and beta-actin. However, the expression of these three housekeeping genes was influenced by hypobaric hypoxia. Consequently, we identified five novel candidate reference genes from the locust microarray data. The gene expression stability of the five candidates, together with the three classical housekeeping genes, were evaluated using two distinct algorithms implemented in geNorm and NormFinder. GeNorm identified Ach (acetyl-CoA hydrolase) and Pgp (phosphoglycolate phosphatase-like) as the most stable genes and NormFinder further distinguished Ach as the most stable one. The validity of Ach as a reference gene was confirmed through comparison with 18S. This study exemplifies the necessity of validating reference genes before their application and the feasibility of identifying condition-specific reference genes from large-scale gene expression data. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of the Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available