4.3 Review

NSAID induced gastrointestinal damage and designing GI-sparing NSAIDs

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 1031-1043

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1516143

Keywords

NSAIDs; gastrointestinal; COX-2 selective inhibitors; nitric oxide; hydrogen sulfide; phosphatidylcholine

Funding

  1. Official Spanish Agency
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. FIS [PI08/1301]
  4. CIBERehd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NSAIDs are widely used to treat pain and rheumatic conditions, but they induce adverse events in different body systems, although the major, most frequent events occur in the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tracts. Areas covered: This review is focused on damage caused by NSAIDs in the upper and lower GI tracts, the different mechanisms of damage and the GI-sparing NSAIDs designed to minimize adverse events based on understanding of these mechanisms. Expert commentary: Among the new NSAIDs, COX-2 selective inhibitors have been extensively investigated, and some were approved for human use. Celecoxib demonstrated its safety for the entire GI tract, compared to traditional NSAIDs. However, coxibs, like traditional NSAIDs, are toxic to the cardiovascular (CV) system. Other GI-sparing agents include nitric oxide-NSAIDs and phosphatidylcholine-associated NSAIDs. Testing in animal models and humans they showed GI advantages over the parent NSAID compounds, but none obtained regulatory approval or were further investigated. Hydrogen sulfide-releasing NSAIDs are currently under clinical development, and more data are needed before clinical use. Alternative therapies, such as modulating gut microbiota, are being explored. Currently, clinicians must continue prescribing traditional NSAIDs or coxibs, associated with/without proton pump inhibitor therapy, based on the presence of GI/CV risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available