4.6 Review

Environmental release, fate and ecotoxicological effects of manufactured ceria nanomaterials

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 533-548

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4en00149d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science to Achieve Results (STAR) [R834857]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) and Agency (EPA) [DBI-1266252, DBI-0830117]
  3. SmartState Center for Environmental Nanoscience
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H013148/1, NE/H008764/1, NE/I008314/1]
  5. USDA AFRI [2011-67006-30181]
  6. CNRS funding for GDRi-iCEINT
  7. French ANR [ANR-10-NANO-0006/MESO-NNET, ANR-3-CESA-0014/NANOSALT]
  8. European Commission [CP-FP 247739]
  9. Sustainable Nanotechnology Organization
  10. Tracy Farmer Institute for Sustainability
  11. Environment, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Office of the Vice President for Research
  12. Associate Dean for Research of the College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky
  13. NSF [CBET-1343638]
  14. NERC [NE/H013148/1, NE/I008314/1, NE/H008764/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. EPA [R834857, 150203] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  16. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010, NE/H008764/1, NE/H013148/1, NE/I008314/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent interest in the environmental fate and effects of manufactured CeO2 nanomaterials (nanoceria) has stemmed from its expanded use for a variety of applications including fuel additives, catalytic converters, chemical and mechanical planarization media and other uses. This has led to a number of publications on the toxicological effects of nanoceria in ecological receptor species, but only limited information is available on possible environmental releases, concentrations in environmental media, or environmental transformations. Increasing material flows of nanoceria in many applications is likely to result in increasing releases to air, water and soils however; insufficient information was available to estimate aquatic exposures that would result in acute or chronic toxicity. The purpose of this review is to identify which areas are lacking in data to perform either regional or site specific ecological risk assessments. While estimates can be made for releases from use as a diesel fuel additive, and predicted toxicity is low in most terrestrial species tested to date, estimates for releases from other uses are difficult at this stage. We recommend that future studies focus on environmentally realistic exposures that take into account potential environmental transformations of the nanoceria surface as well as chronic toxicity studies in benthic aquatic organisms, soil invertebrates and microorganisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available