4.3 Article

International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Recommended Guidelines for Histological Endpoints for Cartilage Repair Studies in Animal Models and Clinical Trials

Journal

CARTILAGE
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 153-172

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1947603510397535

Keywords

articular cartilage; cartilage repair; histology; animal models; collagen type II; collagen type I; polarized light microscopy; biopsy; fibrocartilage; glycosaminoglycan; subchondral bone; tidemark

Categories

Funding

  1. Fonds de Recherche en Sante du Quebec
  2. MRC [G0800248]
  3. Dutch Arthritis Association
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. Canada Research Chair
  7. Endowed Chair from Arthritis Research UK
  8. MRC [G0800248] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0800248] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cartilage repair strategies aim to resurface a lesion with osteochondral tissue resembling native cartilage, but a variety of repair tissues are usually observed. Histology is an important structural outcome that could serve as an interim measure of efficacy in randomized controlled clinical studies. The purpose of this article is to propose guidelines for standardized histoprocessing and unbiased evaluation of animal tissues and human biopsies. Methods were compiled from a literature review, and illustrative data were added. In animal models, treatments are usually administered to acute defects created in healthy tissues, and the entire joint can be analyzed at multiple postoperative time points. In human clinical therapy, treatments are applied to developed lesions, and biopsies are obtained, usually from a subset of patients, at a specific time point. In striving to standardize evaluation of structural endpoints in cartilage repair studies, 5 variables should be controlled: 1) location of biopsy/sample section, 2) timing of biopsy/sample recovery, 3) histoprocessing, 4) staining, and 5) blinded evaluation with a proper control group. Histological scores, quantitative histomorphometry of repair tissue thickness, percentage of tissue staining for collagens and glycosaminoglycan, polarized light microscopy for collagen fibril organization, and subchondral bone integration/structure are all relevant outcome measures that can be collected and used to assess the efficacy of novel therapeutics. Standardized histology methods could improve statistical analyses, help interpret and validate noninvasive imaging outcomes, and permit cross-comparison between studies. Currently, there are no suitable substitutes for histology in evaluating repair tissue quality and cartilaginous character.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available