4.5 Article

Effects of Fostamatinib, an Oral Spleen Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate Results From a Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study

Journal

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 12, Pages 3255-3264

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.38851

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Rigel
  3. Lilly
  4. Vertex
  5. AbbVie
  6. Pfizer
  7. UCB Biosciences
  8. Amgen
  9. Augurex
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  11. Celgene
  12. Centocor
  13. Chugai
  14. Covagen
  15. Daiichi Sankyo
  16. Eli Lilly
  17. GlaxoSmithKline
  18. Janssen Biologics
  19. Merck
  20. Novartis
  21. Novo Nordisk
  22. Otsuka
  23. Roche
  24. Sanofi-Aventis
  25. Schering-Plough
  26. UCB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. This phase III, 52-week study compared fostamatinib with placebo (for 24 weeks) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) therapy. Methods. Patients taking MTX were randomized (1: 1: 1) to receive fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily for 52 weeks (group A), fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and then 150 mg once daily (group B), or placebo for 24 weeks and then fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily (group C). At week 24, the co-primary end points were change from baseline in the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) improvement response rates and change in the modified total Sharp/van der Heijde score of radiographic damage (SHS). Results. In this study, 918 patients were randomized and received > 1 dose of study drug (fostamatinib or placebo); the demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced. Following treatment with both fostamatinib regimens, a statistically significant difference in the ACR20 improvement response was achieved at week 24 as compared with that in patients receiving placebo (49.0% [group A] and 44.4%, [group B] versus 34.2%; P < 0.001 and P 0.006, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference in the SHS between either fostamatinib group and placebo (P 0.25 and P 0.17, respectively). The most common adverse events in patients in groups A, B, and C were hypertension (15.8%, 15.1%, and 3.9%, respectively) and diarrhea (13.9%, 15.1%, and 3.9%, respectively). Elevated blood pressure (> 140/90 mm Hg) occurred at > 1 visit in 44.2%, 41.6%, and 19.3% of patients in each respective group. Conclusion. With the use of either fostamatinib regimen in patients with RA, statistically significant, but not clinically significant, improvements in the ACR20 improvement response over placebo were achieved at 24 weeks, whereas a significant difference in the SHS was not seen. The overall level of response to treatment with fostamatinib was lower than had been observed in the phase II program, but similar adverse events were reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available