4.5 Article

Transport Accessibility Analysis Using GIS: Assessing Sustainable Transport in London

Journal

ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 124-149

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi4010124

Keywords

network analysis; accessibility; spatial planning; infrastructure investment

Funding

  1. Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council ARCADIA: ARCADIA: Adaptation and Resilience in Cities: Analysis and Decision making using Integrated Assessment project [EP/G061254/1]
  2. European Community [308497]
  3. EPSRC [EP/H003630/1]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G061254/1, EP/K012398/1, EP/H003630/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/H003630/1, EP/K012398/1, EP/G061254/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transport accessibility is an important driver of urban growth and key to the sustainable development of cities. This paper presents a simple GIS-based tool developed to allow the rapid analysis of accessibility by different transport modes. Designed to be flexible and use publicly-available data, this tool (built in ArcGIS) uses generalized cost to measure transport costs across networks including monetary and distance components. The utility of the tool is demonstrated on London, UK, showing the differing patterns of accessibility across the city by different modes. It is shown that these patterns can be examined spatially, by accessibility to particular destinations (e.g., employment locations), or as a global measure across a whole city system. A number of future infrastructure scenarios are tested, examining the potential for increasing the use of low-carbon forms of transport. It is shown that private car journeys are still the least cost mode choice in London, but that infrastructure investments can play a part in reducing the cost of more sustainable transport options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available